Evaluation of Writing

Below is a description of the general method used for evaluating writing when assigning grades to pieces written for essays and on examinations.

Five general categories for evaluation are:

Vocabulary, Grammar/Usage, Organization/Style, Communication of Ideas, and Rhetorical Devices.

Each part of the grid contains the descriptor which is used to evaluate how well the written piece performs. For each cell in the grid, a numeric value is assigned. The essay described below would have a grading value of 20 (4 points possible for each category). Actual numbers used will be based on the actual writing objective.

Pt.

Vocabulary

Gramar/Usage

Organization/Style

Ideas

Rhetorical Devices

4

Excellent/Appropriate control; choice; variety; easily understood by native speaker Excellent control grammar, spelling, punctuation; very few errors Sentence lengths & patterns varied; consistent tone; related ideas Relevant, appropriate to task; content well communicated; completeness Excellent logical flow; clear beginning, middle, end; accurate & consistent use of rhetorical devices

3

Good control/choice; moderate variety; native speaker puzzled Good control grammar, spelling, punctuation; some avoidable errors Some variety in sentence lengths & patterns; most ideas related; generally consistent tone Generally good content though topic not fully explored; appropriate length Good flow control; some sense of beginning & closure; mostly logical plan; inconsistent use of rhetorical devices

2

Fair control/choice; minimal variety; malapropisms obvious; difficult for native speaker Fair control grammar, spelling, punctuation; many errors Sentence lengths & variety inconsistent & seldom varied; tone inconsistent; strays from logical plan Adequate content though epetitious & simplistic; inadequate length Poor flow control; lacking sense of form; frequently misused rhetorical divices

1

Poor control and choice; definite lack of variety; native speaker mystified; great dissonance from L1 Excessive grammar, spelling, punctuation errors Sentence lengths & patters repititious; tone lifeless w. little involvement; no logical plan Inadequate development of ideas & content; poor communication; brevity hinders message No attempt at flow; no sense of form; consistently misused rhetorical devices or none

0

Incomprehensible; inappropriate; no production Meaning blocked; text dominated by errors No evidence of organization & style No relevance to task; not enough to evaluate No devices used

Mechanical error evaluation - Letter grade relative to error ratio also used to evaluate Grammar/Usage above

15

A+

 

12

B+

 

9

C+

 

5

D+

14

A

 

11

B

 

8

C

 

4

D

13

A-

 

10

B-

 

7

C

 

3

D-

 

 

 

 

 

 

6

C-

 

2

F



[Entering Umlauts] [GREAL Home Page]